Comments on: malaysian honeymoon

By: Andrew Pouw

Andrew Pouw — Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:24:26 +0000

Oh, the bolded text are indeed my words, but the ones in the indentation are from the interview, of course.

By: h. pouw

h. pouw — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:20:40 +0000

I did see that you stated it in bold form though I thought it was your words.
I am almost done with the book and found this book very thorough and non-biased. Most objective book on the issue of China.

By: Andrew Pouw

Andrew Pouw — Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:02:33 +0000

Dad might disagree with me, but I think Jacques has the best way of perceiving it that I’ve encountered so far. It’s there in the first blockquote, and also can be read in the interview link.

By: t.h. pouw

t.h. pouw — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:29:22 +0000

Great writing! Love to read it. I guess anybody interested in reading your blog would probably be interested in a lot of other interesting things outside the U.S. The book you mentioned actually states that the main difference between China and other counties lies in the fact that China does not see itself as a nation state, rather a civilization state. For clarification of that statement, I would refer you to read his actual book.
http://www.amazon.com/When-China-Rules-World-Western/dp/1594201854/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1268083686&sr=8-1

By: daniel wu

daniel wu — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:25:07 +0000

I really appreciate your ruminations.
How do you figure in China’s issue with the Uyghurs and Tibetans into your framework?